ProMuscleMag Forum

Go Back   ProMuscleMag Forum > Anabolics > Steroid Questions
Register PMM Home FAQ Members List Mark Forums Read

Steroid Questions Discussion of androgenic anabolic steroids and all things related

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-10-2006, 02:11 AM   #31 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southern Muscle
Posts: 1,660
hicktown is on a distinguished road
Default

Im also interested in this topic as EQ is going to be in my next cycle. can we get back to the original question?
hicktown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 03:08 AM   #32 (permalink)
HS WSBB Coach
 
Hades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,970
Hades is on a distinguished road
Default

Holy shit Ross, get the fuck out of this thread! This is exactly why I told you not to respond AT ALL!

Get this shit back on topic, jesus christ.
Hades is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 04:06 AM   #33 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NOT HERE
Posts: 1,186
*The Master* is on a distinguished road
Default

I have run EQ for 15 weeks+ on two occasions.

Do not expect MASS gains. Expect a steady, modest gain in strength, GREAT endurance, RIDICULOUS VASCULARITY, and NO side-effects(for me).

EQ can and SHOULD be run for as long as possible, reason being:

1.) It does NOT shut down the body's endogenous testosterone production.

2.) Due to the Undeclynate ester, OPTIMAL physical gains do not manifest themselves until approximately week 12.

*Use the EQ as a BASE, and CYCLE the supressive compounds like Testosterone. Do a 20 week EQ cycle, adding testosterone PROPIONATE at week 4, then discontinuing at week 12, but REMAINING ON EQ! By REMAINING on the EQ, you will remain in an ANABOLIC STATE, enabling you to HOLD ON TO EVERY POUND OF MUSCLE produced by the testosterone, and, even continue to gain. I would even suggest to ADD some Winstrol at week 16-20.

Because EQ does NOT shut down the body's natural testosterone production, this is all possible.


[R]
*The Master* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 04:14 AM   #34 (permalink)
HS WSBB Coach
 
Hades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,970
Hades is on a distinguished road
Default

Another reason I asked you not to respond is that you've said numerous times that EQ gives no mass gains, and I could bring you 4 personal friends that have the results to proove otherwise.
Hades is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 04:19 AM   #35 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NOT HERE
Posts: 1,186
*The Master* is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hades
Another reason I asked you not to respond is that you've said numerous times that EQ gives no mass gains, and I could bring you 4 personal friends that have the results to proove otherwise.
CYCLE HISTORY.

Tons of guys gain 25lbs on SUPERDROL, because it is the 1st steroid they use. Hell, most of em DON'T EVEN REALIZE that SUPERDROL is an ACTIVE STEROID.

I know guys who have used WINSTROL ONLY for their 1st cycle and gained 15lbs, and LOST FAT.

This is because of their CYCLE HISTORY--or LACK thereof.

Sure, if it is your 1st cycle, EQ will give you some poundages on the scale.

But ASK ANY SEASONED bodybuilder what EQ is to be used for. It CERTAINLY is not mass.

EQ has an INNACCURATE steroid PROFILE on many websites, based on it's somewhat MISLEADING anabolic:androgenic ratio.

[R]
*The Master* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 05:12 AM   #36 (permalink)
On Bended Knee
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 392
TheRealDeal is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by *The Master*
CYCLE HISTORY.

Tons of guys gain 25lbs on SUPERDROL, because it is the 1st steroid they use. My 18 year old friend chris Hell, most of em DON'T EVEN REALIZE that SUPERDROL is an ACTIVE STEROID. My friend chris, yet again (I let him know the dangers of this cycle and about superdrol, unfortunatly it was after his cycle was done.)

I know guys who have used WINSTROL ONLY for their 1st cycle and gained 15lbs, and LOST FAT. my friend aaron, hes on now...first cycle, and hes only drinking the winny.

[R]
Personally hades I think that would be a great cycle idea with the EQ whether its for a bulk or cut...if youre looking for lean mass over a time period id go with 15-20 weeks. Maybe throw in some prop in there too at a low dose like Ross said, since youre looking to hide the fact that youre on and it wont bloat ya too much :awesomewo
TheRealDeal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 06:54 AM   #37 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,154
Vegas has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by *The Master*
But ASK ANY SEASONED bodybuilder what EQ is to be used for. It CERTAINLY is not mass.
So if I find ONE so-called seasoned bodybuilder who disputes your proclamation you will be wrong again. Interesting way to set up an argument.

Quote:
Originally Posted by *The Master*
EQ has an INNACCURATE steroid PROFILE on many websites, based on it's somewhat MISLEADING anabolic:androgenic ratio.
And yet you base much of your recommendations on the anabolic-androgenic ratio of compounds, even though you yourself say that it can be (and often is) misleading and misunderstood by many if not most individuals.
Vegas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2006, 01:35 PM   #38 (permalink)
HS WSBB Coach
 
Hades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,970
Hades is on a distinguished road
Default

TRD, i was actually thinkin longer than 15-20 weeks, I was thinking around the 6 month mark for a cycle.
Hades is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2006, 06:18 PM   #39 (permalink)
On Bended Knee
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 392
TheRealDeal is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hades
TRD, i was actually thinkin longer than 15-20 weeks, I was thinking around the 6 month mark for a cycle.
Oh sweet deal. More slow steady lean mass gains over time :awesomewo
TheRealDeal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2006, 06:27 PM   #40 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,418
TheBrent is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hades
TRD, i was actually thinkin longer than 15-20 weeks, I was thinking around the 6 month mark for a cycle.
.
would you be against a faster acting bold? maybe bold ace?

(i'm not sure why people never run the faster acting boldenone)
TheBrent is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Integrated by BBPixel ©2003-2010, jvbPlugin