![]() |
|
|||||||
| Steroid Questions Discussion of androgenic anabolic steroids and all things related |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#33 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NOT HERE
Posts: 1,186
![]() |
I have run EQ for 15 weeks+ on two occasions.
Do not expect MASS gains. Expect a steady, modest gain in strength, GREAT endurance, RIDICULOUS VASCULARITY, and NO side-effects(for me). EQ can and SHOULD be run for as long as possible, reason being: 1.) It does NOT shut down the body's endogenous testosterone production. 2.) Due to the Undeclynate ester, OPTIMAL physical gains do not manifest themselves until approximately week 12. *Use the EQ as a BASE, and CYCLE the supressive compounds like Testosterone. Do a 20 week EQ cycle, adding testosterone PROPIONATE at week 4, then discontinuing at week 12, but REMAINING ON EQ! By REMAINING on the EQ, you will remain in an ANABOLIC STATE, enabling you to HOLD ON TO EVERY POUND OF MUSCLE produced by the testosterone, and, even continue to gain. I would even suggest to ADD some Winstrol at week 16-20. Because EQ does NOT shut down the body's natural testosterone production, this is all possible. [R] |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NOT HERE
Posts: 1,186
![]() |
Quote:
Tons of guys gain 25lbs on SUPERDROL, because it is the 1st steroid they use. Hell, most of em DON'T EVEN REALIZE that SUPERDROL is an ACTIVE STEROID. I know guys who have used WINSTROL ONLY for their 1st cycle and gained 15lbs, and LOST FAT. This is because of their CYCLE HISTORY--or LACK thereof. Sure, if it is your 1st cycle, EQ will give you some poundages on the scale. But ASK ANY SEASONED bodybuilder what EQ is to be used for. It CERTAINLY is not mass. EQ has an INNACCURATE steroid PROFILE on many websites, based on it's somewhat MISLEADING anabolic:androgenic ratio. [R] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |
|
On Bended Knee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 392
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,154
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,418
![]() |
Quote:
would you be against a faster acting bold? maybe bold ace? (i'm not sure why people never run the faster acting boldenone) |
|
|
|
|