2008/9 Dodge Challenger

[flexall454]

dally that sig fuckin rocks bro!! LOL Great movie!

[needmorestrength]

That is absolutly amazing bro!!! Id buy that in a second dependant on specs.. I CANT WAIT for the Cami to make its return!! Id love to have my current one next to a new one!! I wonder which would be faster?

[aXe]

That car is badass. I had a '70 cuda, and i wish they would remake them as well.

[jjjxmmmxbbb]

thats one hell of a car

[clhp20]

The specs on the car are as follows;

The Hemi has 425 hp, 420 lb-ft of torque, and a six-speed manual transmission. So geared, with its 4,100 pound weight, it can do 0-60 in 4.5 seconds (with 20 inch wheels on front and 21 inch wheels on back), and runs the quarter mile in 13 seconds flat; top speed is 174 mph (limited by wind resistance), while gas mileage is estimated at 14 city, 20 highway, very good compared with the original Challenger. Brakes are more effective than the original - stopping from 60 mph can be done in 133 feet.

There are rumors that the new 392 Hemi crate engine, designed for racing, will go along with the new Dodge Challenger body. The 392 is apparently a racing-only engine in current form, not a production design, but a lower-power version may well be made for production and appear in the Challenger. The Challenger concept car to be shown at NAIAS (Detroit, January 2006; the Camaro will also be shown) uses, not surprisingly, the SRT-8 6.1 liter engine — but, unlike any current production LX car, it also has a six-speed manual gearbox. (Automobile suggested that the 510 horsepower 6.4 liter 392 Hemi might be used.) There are issues with the 392 - most notably the question of what untrained drivers will do with that much power. A fairly large number of Vipers left this world unexpectedly.


To read more since these are just excerpts go to http://www.allpar.com/cars/dodge/challenger.html

[clhp20]

The camaro in it's concept version, really sucks ass. http://www.automobilemag.com/auto_sh...amaro_concept/ It looks like a combo of multiple cars. Some points it looks dead on as to what " i think" the new Camaro should look like. And in the same breathe, i say EEK !!!!! what the hell are they thinking. The inside looks dead on or so i think.. Chevy has never been good at bringing back old cars. There lack of new versions of the old prove that. They need to make it look like the older version. say 66-69.

[clhp20]

javascript:dushaneZoom(

'http://automobilemag.com/auto_shows/naias_2006/0602_camaro_ofsk_02_900.jpg')  and javascript:dushaneZoom

(

'http://automobilemag.com/auto_shows/naias_2006/0602_camaro_ofsk_01_900.jpg') and finally this javascript:dushaneZoom

(

'http://automobilemag.com/auto_shows/naias_2006/0602_camaro_ofsk_04_900.jpg'

) makes me think this is a bad ass car.

[clhp20]

Originally Posted by clhp20

The camaro in it's concept version, really sucks ass. http://www.automobilemag.com/auto_sh...amaro_concept/ It looks like a combo of multiple cars. Some points it looks dead on as to what " i think" the new Camaro should look like. And in the same breathe, i say EEK !!!!! what the hell are they thinking. The inside looks dead on or so i think.. Chevy has never been good at bringing back old cars. There lack of new versions of the old prove that. They need to make it look like the older version. say 66-69.

Here are some of the good pics. The bad ones really outway the good ones imo

[clhp20]

[img]http://mutiny32.com/camaro/camaro_1.jpg[img]

[.Nutz.]

the back tires on that challenger are fuckin HUGE!!! almost bigger than mass even